Friedrich Schiller, "Eleventh
Letter" in On the Aesthetic Education of Man: In a Series of Letters, trans. Reginald Snell (Bristol:
Thoemmes Press, 1994).
.
Document Contents
.0 Schiller
.1 Microsoft
.2 Term
Clusters, Layered
.3 Operation
Sequence, Parameters, and Count: Find and Replace
When abstraction mounts as high as it
possibly can, it arrives at two final concepts, at which it must halt and
recognize its limits. It distinguishes in Man something that endures and
something that perpetually alters. The enduring it calls his person, and the changing his condition.
Person and conditionÑthe self and its
determinationsÑwhich we think of in the absolute Being as one and the same, are
eternally two in the finite. Throughout the persistence of the person the
condition changes, through every change of condition the person persists. We
pass from rest to activity, from passion to indifference, from assent to
contradiction; but we
always exist, and what springs immediately from ourselves remains. In the
absolute Person alone all the determinations persist alongside the personality,
since they flow out
of the personality. All that Divinity is, it is just because it is; consequently it is everything to
eternity, because it is eternal.
Since in Man, as finite being, person and
condition are distinct, neither can the condition be derived from the person
nor the person from the condition. In the latter case, the person would have to
alter; in the former, the condition would have to persist, and thus in each
case either the personality or the finiteness would cease. Not because we think
and will and feel do we exist; not because we exist and think and will do we
feel. We exist because we exist; we feel, think and will because there is
something other besides ourselves.
The person must therefore be its own
ground, for the enduring cannot issue from alteration; and so we have in the
first place the idea of absolute being grounded in itself, that is to say of freedom. Condition must have a ground; since it
does not exist through the person, and is thus not absolute, it must result; and so we have in the second place the
qualification of all dependent being of becoming, time. 'Time is the condition of all becoming'
is an identical proposition, for it merely asserts that the result is the
condition of something resulting.
The person that is revealed in the
eternally persisting ego, and only there, cannot become, cannot have a
beginning in time; the reverse is rather the caseÑtime must begin in it,
because something constant must form the basis of change. There must be
something that alters, if alteration is to occur; this something cannot
therefore itself be alteration. In saying that the flower blooms and fades, we
make the flower the thing that persists through the transformation and lend it,
so to say, a personality in which both those conditions are manifested. It is
no objection that Man has first to become; for Man is not simply person in general
but person situated in a particular condition. But every condition, every
definite instance arises in time, and so Man as phenomenon must have his
beginning, although the pure intelligence in him is eternal. Without time, that
is to say without becoming it, he would never be a definite existence; his
personality would certainly exist in potentiality, but not in fact. Only
through the succession of its perceptions does the persisting ego itself come
to appear.
The subject matter of activity, therefore,
or the reality which the supreme Intelligence creates out of itself, must first
be received by Man,
and he does in fact receive it as something external to himself in space and as
something changing with him in time, through the medium of perception. This
changing substance in him is accompanied by his never-changing egoÑand to
remain perpetually himself throughout all change, to turn every perception into
experience, that is into unity of knowledge, and to make each of his
manifestations in time a law for all time, is the rule which is prescribed for
him by his rational nature. Only as he alters does he exist; only as he remains unalterable does he exist. Man conceived in his perfection
would accordingly be the constant unity which amidst the tides of change
remains eternally the same.
Now although an infinite being, a
divinity, cannot become,
we must surely call divine a tendency which has for its infinite task the
proper characteristic of divinity, absolute realization of capacity (actuality
of all that is possible) and absolute unity of manifestation (necessity of all
that is actual). Beyond question Man carries the potentiality for divinity
within himself; the path to divinity, if we may call a path what never reaches
its goal, is open to him in his senses.
His personality, regarded in itself alone
and independently of all sense material, is merely the potentiality of a
possible infinite expression; and so long as he neither contemplates nor feels
he is still nothing but form and empty capacity. His sense faculty, regarded in
itself alone and dissociated from all spontaneous activity of the mind, can do
nothing beyond making him materialÑfor without it he is mere formÑbut by no
means uniting him to matter. So long as he only perceives, only desires and acts
from mere appetite, he is still nothing but world, if we understand by this term simply
the formless content of time. It is indeed his sense faculty alone which turns
his capacity into operative power; but it is only his personality which makes
his operation really his own. Thus in order not to be merely world, he must
lend form to his material; in order not to be merely form, he must make actual
the potentiality which he bears within himself. He realizes form when he
creates time, and opposes constancy with alteration, the eternal unity of his
ego with the diversity of the world; he gives form to matter when he proceeds
to annul time, affirms persistence within change, and subjects the diversity of
the world to the unity of his ego.
Hence flow two contrary demands upon Man,
the two fundamental laws of his sensuous-rational nature. The first insists
upon absolute reality:
he is to turn everything that is mere form into world, and realize all his
potentialities; the second insists upon absolute formality: he is to eradicate in himself
everything that is merely world, and produce harmony it all its mutations; in
other words, his is to turn outward everything internal, and give form to
everything external. Both tasks, considered in their supreme fulfilment, lead
back to the conception of divinity from which I started.
.1 Microsoft
When abstraction mounts as high as it
possibly can, it arrives at two final concepts, at which it must halt and
recognize its limits. It distinguishes in The Medium something that endures and
something that perpetually alters. The enduring it calls her script, and the changing her data.
Script and dataÑthe medium and its
determinationsÑwhich media objects process of in the absolute System as one and
the same, are eternally two in the finite. Throughout the persistence of the
script the data changes, through every change of data the script persists.
Media objects pass from rest to activity, from passion to indifference, from
assent to contradiction; but media objects always run, and what springs immediately from media
remains. In the absolute Script alone all the determinations persist alongside
the program, since they flow out
of the program. All that A Network is, it is just because it is; consequently it is everything to
eternity, because it is eternal.
Since in The Medium, as finite system,
script and data are distinct, neither can the data be derived from the script
nor the script from the data. In the latter case, the script would have to
alter; in the former, the data would have to persist, and thus in each case
either the program or the signal would cease. Not because media objects process
and iterate and parse do media objects run; not because media objects run and
process and iterate do media objects parse. Media objects run because media
objects run; media objects parse, process and iterate because there is
something other besides media.
The script must therefore be its own
index, for the enduring cannot issue from alteration; and so media objects have
in the first place the idea of absolute system indexed to itself, that is to
say of freedom. Data
must have a index; since it does not run through the script, and is thus not
absolute, it must output;
and so media objects have in the second place the qualification of all
dependent system of becoming, code.
'Code is the data of all becoming' is an identical proposition, for it merely
asserts that the output is the data of something resulting.
The script that is revealed in the
eternally persisting syntax, and only there, cannot become, cannot have a
beginning in code; the reverse is rather the caseÑcode must begin in it,
because something constant must form the basis of change. There must be
something that alters, if alteration is to occur; this something cannot
therefore itself be alteration. In saying that the user blooms and fades, media
objects make the user the thing that persists through the transformation and
lend it, so to say, a program in which both those conditions are manifested. It
is no objection that The Medium has first to become; for The Medium is not
simply script in general but script situated in a particular data. But every
data, every definite instance arises in code, and so The Medium as phenomenon
must have her beginning, although the pure process in her is eternal. Without
code, that is to say without becoming it, she would never be a definite
existence; her program would certainly run in potentiality, but not in fact.
Only through the succession of its perceptions does the persisting syntax
itself come to appear.
The subject matter of activity,
therefore, or the numericality which the supreme Process creates out of itself,
must first be received
by The Medium, and she does in fact receive it as something external to herself
in operation and as something changing with her in code, through the medium of
interpretation. This changing substance in her is accompanied by her
never-changing syntaxÑand to remain perpetually herself throughout all change,
to turn every interpretation into experience, that is into unity of execution,
and to make each of her manifestations in code a law for all code, is the rule
which is prescribed for her by her binary nature. Only as she alters does she run; only as she remains unalterable does she run. The Medium conceived in her
perfection would accordingly be the constant unity which amidst the tides of
change remains eternally the same.
Now although an infinite system, a a
Network, cannot become,
media objects must surely call distributed a tendency which has for its
infinite task the proper characteristic of a Network, absolute realization of
capacity (actuality of all that is possible) and absolute unity of
manifestation (necessity of all that is actual). Beyond question The Medium
carries the potentiality for a Network within herself; the path to a Network,
if media objects may call a path what never reaches its goal, is open to her in
her algorithms.
Her program, regarded in itself alone and
independently of all algorithmic modulation, is merely the potentiality of a
possible infinite expression; and so long as she neither compiles nor parses
she is still nothing but form and empty capacity. Her algorithmic faculty,
regarded in itself alone and dissociated from all spontaneous activity of the
compiler, can do nothing beyond making her modulationÑfor without it she is
mere formÑbut by no means uniting her to matter. So long as she only perceives,
only desires and acts from mere appetite, she is still nothing but signal, if media objects understand by this
term simply the formless content of code. It is indeed her algorithmic faculty
alone which turns her capacity into operative power; but it is only her program
which makes her operation really her own. Thus in order not to be merely
signal, she must lend form to her modulation; in order not to be merely form,
she must make actual the potentiality which she bears within herself. She
realizes form when she creates code, and opposes constancy with alteration, the
eternal unity of her syntax with the diversity of the signal; she gives form to
matter when she proceeds to annul code, affirms persistence within change, and
subjects the diversity of the signal to the unity of her syntax.
Hence flow two contrary demands upon The
Medium, the two fundamental laws of her algorithmic-binary nature. The first
insists upon absolute numericality:
she is to turn everything that is mere form into signal, and realize all her
potentialities; the second insists upon absolute formality: she is to eradicate in herself
everything that is merely signal, and produce interface it all its mutations;
in other words, her is to turn outward everything internal, and give form to
everything external. Both tasks, considered in their supreme fulfilment, lead
back to the conception of a Network from which I started.
.2 Term
Clusters, Layered
Term
Clusters, Layered (Schiller 1st Order)
Being |
system |
Divinity |
a
Network |
divine |
distributed |
|
|
Man |
The
Medium |
person |
script |
condition |
data |
ego |
syntax |
self |
medium |
we |
media
objects |
ourselves |
media |
personality |
program |
|
|
time |
code |
space |
operation |
|
|
reality |
numericality |
formality |
formality |
material |
modulation |
result |
output |
|
|
finiteness |
signal |
world |
signal |
ground |
index |
grounded
in |
indexed
to |
|
|
harmony |
interface |
flower |
user |
|
|
exist |
run |
will |
iterate |
|
|
mind |
compiler |
intelligence |
process |
contemplates |
compiles |
think |
process |
knowledge |
execution |
|
|
perception |
interpretation |
feel |
parse |
feels |
parses |
|
|
senses |
algorithms |
sense |
algorithmic |
sensuous |
algorithmic |
rational |
binary |
|
|
he |
she |
his |
her |
him |
her |
himself |
herself |
Term
Clusters, Layered (Microsoft 2nd Order)
distributed |
divine |
system |
Being |
a
Network |
Divinity |
|
|
data |
condition |
signal |
world |
signal |
finiteness |
modulation |
material |
binary |
rational |
numericality |
reality |
|
|
script |
person |
algorithms |
senses |
algorithmic |
sense |
algorithmic |
sensuous |
formality |
formality |
syntax |
ego |
program |
personality |
|
|
code |
time |
|
|
index |
ground |
indexed
to |
grounded
in |
|
|
media |
ourselves |
media
objects |
we |
medium |
self |
The
Medium |
Man |
|
|
operation |
space |
run |
exist |
execution |
knowledge |
compiler |
mind |
compiles |
contemplates |
|
|
parse |
feel |
parses |
feels |
interpretation |
perception |
process |
intelligence |
process |
think |
|
|
iterate |
will |
output |
result |
|
|
interface |
harmony |
user |
flower |
|
|
he |
she |
his |
her |
him |
her |
himself |
herself |
Term
Clusters, Layered (Schiller 2nd Order)
Being |
system |
Divinity |
a
Network |
divine |
distributed |
|
|
Man |
The
Medium |
person |
script |
condition |
data |
ego |
syntax |
self |
medium |
we |
media
objects |
ourselves |
media |
personality |
program |
|
|
time |
code |
space |
operation |
|
|
reality |
numericality |
formality |
formality |
material |
modulation |
result |
output |
|
|
finiteness |
signal |
world |
signal |
ground |
index |
grounded
in |
indexed
to |
|
|
harmony |
interface |
flower |
user |
|
|
exist |
run |
will |
iterate |
|
|
mind |
compiler |
intelligence |
process |
contemplates |
compiles |
think |
process |
knowledge |
execution |
|
|
perception |
interpretation |
feel |
parse |
feels |
parses |
|
|
senses |
algorithms |
sense |
algorithmic |
sensuous |
algorithmic |
rational |
binary |
|
|
he |
she |
his |
her |
him |
her |
himself |
herself |
Term
Clusters, Layered (Microsoft 1st Order)
distributed |
divine |
system |
Being |
a
Network |
Divinity |
|
|
data |
condition |
signal |
world |
signal |
finiteness |
modulation |
material |
binary |
rational |
numericality |
reality |
|
|
script |
person |
algorithms |
senses |
algorithmic |
sense |
algorithmic |
sensuous |
formality |
formality |
syntax |
ego |
program |
personality |
|
|
code |
time |
|
|
index |
ground |
indexed
to |
grounded
in |
|
|
media |
we |
media
objects |
ourselves |
medium |
self |
The
Medium |
Man |
|
|
operation |
space |
run |
exist |
execution |
knowledge |
compiler |
mind |
compiles |
contemplates |
|
|
parse |
feel |
parses |
feels |
interpretation |
perception |
process |
intelligence |
process |
think |
|
|
iterate |
will |
output |
result |
|
|
interface |
harmony |
user |
flower |
|
|
he |
she |
his |
her |
him |
her |
himself |
herself |
SEQUENCE
|
FIND |
REPLACE |
COUNT
|
1 |
Being |
system |
5 |
2 |
Divinity |
a Network |
6 |
3 |
divine |
distributed |
1 |
4 |
Man |
The Medium |
9 |
5 |
person |
script |
14 |
6 |
condition |
data |
13 |
7 |
personality |
program |
7 |
8 |
time |
code |
12 |
9 |
space |
operation |
1 |
10 |
reality |
numericality |
2 |
11 |
formality |
formality |
1 |
12 |
material |
modulation |
3 |
13 |
result |
output |
2 |
14 |
ground |
index |
2 |
15 |
grounded in |
indexed to |
1 |
16 |
harmony |
interface |
1 |
17 |
flower |
user |
2 |
18 |
exist |
run |
9 |
19 |
will |
iterate |
3 |
20 |
mind |
compiler |
1 |
21 |
intelligence |
process |
2 |
22 |
contemplates |
compiles |
1 |
23 |
think |
process |
4 |
24 |
knowledge |
execution |
1 |
25 |
perception |
interpretation |
2 |
26 |
feel |
parse |
3 |
27 |
feels |
parses |
1 |
28 |
senses |
algorithms |
1 |
29 |
sense |
algorithmic |
3 |
30 |
sensuous |
algorithmic |
1 |
31 |
rational |
binary |
2 |
32 |
ego |
syntax |
5 |
33 |
self |
medium |
1 |
34 |
finiteness |
signal |
1 |
35 |
world |
signal |
6 |
36 |
ourselves |
media |
2 |
37 |
we |
media objects |
16 |
38 |
he |
she |
20 |
39 |
his |
her |
22 |
40 |
him |
her |
7 |
41 |
himself |
herself |
5 |
Find And
Replace Parameters
Find Whole Words
Only;
Replace All.